Jump to content

Talk:Louis IX of France

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 11 October 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 17:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Louis IX of FranceLouis IX – There are three articles on the English Wikipedia titled Louis IX. Of these, the French king has by far the most page views. I believe Louis IX of France to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Векочел (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not for the earlier or later ones in fact! Johnbod (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Concerns about Neutrality

[edit]

I have deep concerns about the tone and neutrality of this article. It makes limited statements about the impact of his Islamophobic and antisemitic policies and actions, and frames such a fraught topic as the Crusades in a worryingly positive manner.

I think this article would benefit from being rewritten somewhat for a more neutral tone. Fluorescent Jellyfish (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is evident that you do not have any "concerns" about the neutrality of this article but stumbled upon it, decided it did not conform with your own bias and slapped a Neutrality banner onto it. 2A01:E0A:3D4:74C0:6926:A06F:7DD5:7545 (talk) 12:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, most historical figures of the time were antisemitic or islamaphobic based on the society they came from or the culture they had. His alleged Islamaphobia is not shown and the Crusades are not seen as positive in recent Western Historiography. Both sides committed atrocities during the Crusades and the First Crusade was defensive of the Christians in the Middle East, the rest being mistakes. Edgar Aetheling 25 (talk) 04:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a series on Integralism?

[edit]

It is ridiculously anachronistic to include the biography of this medieval king in a series which regards an ideological notion of the post romantic era. 2601:18F:E80:894B:FCFC:8D08:34BB:89C1 (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if Louis IX is considered an Integralist by academics, but the template also includes Constantine I.
King Josiah, on the other hand, seems to be a bit of a stretch, so I'll take the liberty of removing him from the template. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

As this page is subject to frequent vandalism recently, I request it should be moved to protected. Edgar Aetheling 25 (talk) 04:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgar Aetheling 25: Protection for pages can be requested at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]