Talk:National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party

The article combines:

Info from 中國共產黨歷次全國代表大會 (Chinese Communist Party PPCCs in the Past) (in Chinese), and
Info collected by Olivier originally in Communist Party of China. For the original version, see here.

A discrepancy

The "qi da" is mentioned to be conferred in 1945, but the Flag of the People's Republic of China said it's in 1949. kt2 21:44, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

You're right, the flag was designed in 1949. The film 'founding of a republic' has a scene which shows how it happened with the founders of the People's Republic deciding on the national flag as well as the national anthem. If there are no objections I'll remove that from the article. Extua (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"The official status of Jiang Zemin's Three Represents theory may not last the Congress." This a pretty serious claim tantamount to claiming Maoism may not survive the next congress, I havent found any resources backing it up. A major policy shift like that even in the consideration would have some sources no? --Stalin1942 02:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right it is pure speculation. Delete it if you wish. But seriously, let alone Hu, the Chinese public has grown tired of this "Three Represents" thing. Colipon+(T) 05:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speculation is fine as long as someone other than wikipedia is doing the specultaing. --Stalin1942 19:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove

There have been several congresses which modified the party's general direction. The 11th Party Congress, specifically its third plenum, began Chinese economic reform in 1978. The 16th Party Congress saw Jiang Zemin's Three Represents entrenched into the party's Constitution as one of its guiding ideologies.

The third plenum was a meeting of the Party Central Committee. The Party Congress itself didn't change the direction of the Party.

Roadrunner 16:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect needed from National Party Congress

A redirect to this article from National Party Congress is needed, because this event is very often called this in English. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That is very much of a common noun and maybe is used by multiple other party congresses. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 14:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Theoretically"? Huh?

"The National Congress is theoretically the highest body within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)."

Why is the adjective "theoretically" here? Autisticml (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]