Jump to content

Talk:Anton Chekhov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleAnton Chekhov is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 11, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
October 24, 2020Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 15, 2017, July 15, 2022, and July 15, 2024.
Current status: Former featured article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anton Chekhov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I read this exchange. I think you are wrong when stating that "The fact checkow called himself 'maloross' in certain contexts ("Little Russian") does not mean he was Ukrainian. Little Russia is a geographical concept inhabited by Ukrainians, Russians, Ukrainian Cossacks, Russian Cossacks, Serbs, Germans, and who else not. It did have a distinct "South Russian" cultural identity, and that's what Chechow had in mind, not his ethnicity."
In Chekhov's times in Russian empire, "maloross" meant Ukrainian. You can check with any unbiased Russian to confirm. When people were saying that they are "maloross" they meant Ukrainian, not that they are Germans with a distinct "South Russian" cultural identity or "who else not". By the same token, if I would say that I am Canadian, you would respond with "no. you actually do not mean that. you mean that you possess a distinct Canadian cultural identity, not the ethnicity." Most of the time you would be plain wrong because Canadian actually means Canadian.
Just wonder if Chekhov has ever called himself Russian. Also wonder why those occasions are not dismissed with the statement "oh. he was joking. that is not what he had in mind." 2600:1700:25E0:9870:C579:6A35:1B82:920E (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Chekhov knew Ukrainian and one of his friends — Maria Zankovetska was trying to convince him to publish his writings in Ukrainian language instead of Russian. Chekhov preferred to publish in Russian because he was dreaming of an actual career as a writer. Publishing in Ukrainian would make that few magnitudes harder as Ukrainian identity and language were suppressed by Russian Imperial regime for over a century already at the time. Mr Fantastic Knowledge (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

english

[edit]
File:Shaine

He was Ukrainian by ethnicity BTW

[edit]

Just saying in case anyone is interested. Mr Fantastic Knowledge (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone is interested, the claim above this reply isn't supported by reliable sources making it an original research. Summer talk 22:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Чехов як українець. Archived 2018-08-14 at the Wayback Machine
  • [1] В листі до Д. В. Григоровича Чехов згадує про своє українське походження: «Правда, в моих жилах течет ленивая хохлацкая кровь»
  • [2] В листі до Л. А. Сулержицького Чехов відносить себе до «хохлів»: «Очень рад, что Вы стали Думать иначе о нас, хохлах»
  • [3] В листі до Августина Врзала Чехов дає короткі автобіографічні данні, згадуючи, що: «Дед мой был малоросс, крепостной; до освобождения крестьян»
  • [4] У своєму листі до О. С. Суворина Чехов підкреслює свою любов до криниць-журавлів та побілених хат, пояснюючи це своєю «хохлацкой кровью»
  • [5]У листі до Суворина Чехов пише про свою «хохлацкую логику»
188.163.104.39 (talk) 14:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This already appears on the page in section "Childhood". Perhaps something could be added, but one would need a couple of strong secondary RS to place this to proper context. My very best wishes (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. He was not an ethnic Ukrainian, all of his ancestors on his mother's side were Russian, on his father's side, only his grandmother was Ukrainian.
2. A quote from the article in your link: "Ukraine is dear and close to my heart. I love its literature, music and beautiful song, full of magical melody. I love the Ukrainian people, who gave the world such a titan as Taras Shevchenko",
- this is a fake quote that first appeared in 1941 in the newspaper "Soviet Ukraine" in an article by A. Shemetov. The original of this letter has not been found.
http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1901-1902/letter-3547.htm - this is the only letter from Chekhov to Krymsky.
He also could not say that he had "Ukrainian blood", in his texts the word Ukrainian was almost never encountered, mostly either "khokhol" or "maloros".
3. The fact that he jokingly calls himself "khokhol" in his letters, referring to his laziness - does not mean that he considered himself Ukrainian. If you draw conclusions from his letters, then there is also his letter where he criticizes a Ukrainian writer, and unflatteringly speaks about "khokhls". http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1892-1894/letter-1365.htm. There are also his letters in which he misses Russia http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1904/letter-4459.htm. He writes "our Russian life is much more talented"
http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1900-1901/letter-3006.htm
He also worked to have a monument to Peter the Great erected in his hometown of Taganrog - http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1897-1898/letter-2292.htm
Obviously, he was patriotically inclined towards Russia. He was Russian, wrote in Russian and about Russians. Krist krist krist (talk) 09:31, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mix of explanatory footnotes & ref footnotes is very messy; I plan to fix as per WP:CITEVAR

[edit]

I found a very awkward & unworkable mix of explanatory footnotes treated as ref tags & what is essentially parenthetical referencing without the parentheses mixed in. The latter should really be shortened footnotes, but you cannot put {{sfn}} wishing ref tags. However, you can put {{sfn}} with the explanatory footnote template, {{sfn}}.

I am going to convert the ref tags that are really explanatory footnotes to {{efn}} & {{notelist}} as per WP:CITEVAR:

  • imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;
  • fixing errors in citation coding, including incorrectly used template parameters, and <ref> markup problems: an improvement because it helps the citations to be parsed correctly;

Peaceray (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw {{sfnm}} which should handle quotes. Peaceray (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A revert

[edit]

This edit [6]:

  1. is not a proper summary of the body of the page (see section Anton_Chekhov#Legacy);
  2. is supported by a single ref to an opinion by Daniel Burt (author), but it is included without an explicit attribution and as a statement of fact in WP voice
  3. is an unnecessary duplication of content in next phrases of the lead explaining why he was a great writer.
I have reverted your recent edit per WP:BRD. Please self-revert and get WP:CONSENSUS for including this new claim to the lead. Thanks. My very best wishes (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]