User talk:NightCrawler/ban
I'm not clear about why NightCrawler is/is to be banned. The only good reason I can see for hardbanning is persistent vandalism. Offending "good" users doesn't seem to me to be sufficient justification, nor does being testy. The problems with User:Petermanchester look to me like the result of miscommunication and misunderstanding. And if you're serious about something you should get testy. User:Mathieugp and I have done some pretty good barracking of each other but that doesn't mean I think either that he is worthless or that his ideas are entirely wrong. As a distinguished Canadian political scientist has said, you don't talk about politics in a barber shop because there are razors lying around. This ain't a barber shop.
Or perhaps I've missed something. Trontonian 16:11, 17 Nov 2003 (UTC)
I don't think anyone is saying that NightCrawler is worthless, Trontonian. I have certainly never said that. Peter Manchester 13:44, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- I didn't say you said he was worthless. People want to ban him, though, which implies that he's worthless. As we say in Canada, maudite marde de pape en plastique. Trontonian
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:NightCrawler/ban" page.
